The Fully Automated Compiling Technique (FACT): A Historical Overview of a Pioneering Programming Language
In the ever-evolving world of computer programming, several languages have come and gone, each contributing to the foundation of modern computing. One such early language, which despite its eventual discontinuation, left an indelible mark on the field, is the Fully Automated Compiling Technique (FACT). Developed by the Datamatic Division of Minneapolis Honeywell for its model 800 series business computers, FACT was introduced in 1959 and was a precursor to the development of more widely known programming languages, such as COBOL. This article delves into the history, design principles, and lasting influence of FACT on the evolution of programming languages.
Origins and Development
The FACT programming language was created by the Datamatic Division of Minneapolis Honeywell, specifically for use with the company’s Model 800 series business computers. These systems were used primarily for business data processing and were an essential part of the computational infrastructure of the late 1950s and early 1960s. At the heart of FACT’s creation was the desire to streamline the process of compiling programs, hence the language’s full name—”Fully Automated Compiling Technique.”
The software was developed under the auspices of Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), a leading IT services company, with the notable contributions of key figures such as Fletcher Jones, Roy Nutt, and Robert L. Patrick. The development was done on contract for Richard Clippinger of Honeywell, who was instrumental in overseeing the creation of FACT as a tool that could automate much of the manual work involved in compiling programs.
Interestingly, the design of FACT was influenced by Basic English, a linguistic project developed by British philosopher C.K. Ogden in the 1920s. Basic English sought to simplify the English language, reducing its complexity by limiting the vocabulary to a smaller, more manageable set of words. This philosophical approach to simplifying language found its way into the design of FACT, where the goal was to make the programming process more accessible and less error-prone.
The Design and Features of FACT
FACT was a high-level programming language that allowed users to write programs in a manner much closer to natural language than the machine-level languages of its time. This made it significantly easier for business professionals and analysts—who were not necessarily computer scientists—to engage with the process of programming.
-
Automated Compilation: The most innovative feature of FACT was its automated compilation technique. Traditional compilers at the time required a great deal of manual intervention, often requiring programmers to write assembly language code or interact directly with machine code. FACT, in contrast, allowed for a higher degree of automation in translating source code into machine-readable code. This eliminated many of the tedious tasks that had previously slowed down the software development process.
-
Influence on COBOL: FACT’s emphasis on automated compilation and its focus on simplifying the process of writing business applications had a profound impact on the development of COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language). COBOL, which emerged in the early 1960s, became one of the most widely used programming languages for business applications, and many of its features can be traced back to FACT’s design philosophy. Both languages sought to make the programming process more accessible, particularly to non-technical users in business environments.
-
Simplified Syntax: One of the most noteworthy aspects of FACT was its relatively simple and straightforward syntax. While languages like Assembly or Fortran were more complex and required an in-depth understanding of the underlying hardware, FACT’s syntax was designed to be more intuitive and human-readable. This approach reduced the barrier to entry for those who lacked formal training in computer science.
-
Limited Vocabulary: Taking inspiration from Basic English, FACT used a restricted vocabulary to ensure that the language remained easy to learn and understand. This limited set of instructions was sufficient for most business applications, allowing users to focus on solving problems without being bogged down by unnecessary complexity.
-
Emphasis on Business Data Processing: As a language tailored for business data processing, FACT was designed to handle common tasks such as record manipulation, data sorting, and report generation. These tasks were central to the needs of the time, as businesses began to realize the potential of computers to streamline operations and improve decision-making through better data management.
FACT’s Impact on Later Languages
While FACT itself was ultimately discontinued, its contributions to the evolution of programming languages are undeniable. The language’s design influenced the creation of several subsequent programming languages, particularly COBOL. In fact, many of the core features of COBOL—such as its emphasis on business data processing, its human-readable syntax, and its ability to compile automatically—can be traced back to the principles established by FACT.
Moreover, FACT’s influence extends beyond just COBOL. Its design philosophy also impacted the development of later languages like ALGOL and FORTRAN—two other foundational languages that played significant roles in the growth of business computing and scientific computing, respectively. In this sense, FACT served as a critical stepping stone in the broader evolution of high-level programming languages.
The automated compilation concept pioneered by FACT also foreshadowed many modern developments in compiler technology, where the process of turning source code into executable code has become increasingly sophisticated and automated.
The Decline and Discontinuation of FACT
Despite its early promise and innovative features, FACT was eventually discontinued. Several factors contributed to its decline, including:
-
Technological Advancements: As the field of computer science advanced, new programming languages and more powerful compilers emerged that offered improved performance and greater flexibility. Languages like COBOL and FORTRAN, for example, became the dominant tools in the business and scientific computing sectors, rendering FACT less relevant.
-
Limited Scope: FACT was primarily designed for a specific set of business applications, and while it was effective in that domain, its limitations in terms of general-purpose programming meant that it was never adopted as widely as other languages. Its focus on business data processing, while valuable at the time, eventually became a narrow niche as computing needs evolved.
-
Competition from Other Languages: As the programming landscape grew, FACT faced increasing competition from other languages that were also designed to simplify the programming process, such as COBOL and later, Basic. These languages offered similar benefits while providing greater flexibility and broader applicability.
Despite its discontinuation, FACT’s legacy remains important. Its automated compilation technique and its focus on making programming more accessible to non-experts set the stage for many of the innovations that followed in the development of programming languages.
Conclusion
The Fully Automated Compiling Technique (FACT) was an innovative programming language that, while short-lived, had a significant impact on the trajectory of computer science. Developed in the late 1950s for business data processing, FACT introduced automated compilation, human-readable syntax, and simplified programming principles that influenced the design of COBOL and many other languages that followed.
Although FACT was discontinued, its legacy lives on in the features that are now commonplace in modern programming languages. The language’s emphasis on automation and simplification helped pave the way for the widespread adoption of high-level programming languages, which continue to shape the world of software development today. FACT may no longer be in use, but its contribution to the history of programming languages remains invaluable, marking an important chapter in the ongoing story of computing.